Appellant in a criminal appeal sought permission to withdraw the matter as it had been settled with the respondents. The court granted permission and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 16TH POUSHA, 1942
CRL.A.No.226 OF 2005
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 13-10-2004 IN CC 83/1999 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, KUNNAMANGALAM
APPELLANT/ COMPLAINANT :
MEPPALLI RAJAN, S/O. CHANDU PANIKER, THETTUMMAL HOUS, CHEROOPPA, CHEROOPPA AMSOM, MALLAPRAM DESOM.
BY ADV. SRI.A.V.M.SALAHUDIN
RESPONDENTS/ ACCUSED AND STATE :
1 AYYANARI APPU NAIR, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. APPUNNI MENON-DEVAKI AMMA, CHEROOPPA AMSOM, MALLAPRAM DESOM.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN R4 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.M.N.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.A.No.226 OF 2005
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 6th day of January 2021
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled. He seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
Permission is granted. Accordingly this appeal is dismissed
as withdrawn.
Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE
RKM
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to withdraw the criminal appeal which was found settled.
Whether permission can be granted to withdraw the appeal and subsequently dismiss it.
MEPPALLI RAJAN
AYYANARI APPU NAIR
SUGATHAN
MANOHARAN
STATE OF KERALA
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
