Binoy T.M v. M.T.Sukumaran
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court recorded the submission that compliance with previous directions has been met and closed the contempt proceedings against the petitioner in WPC No. 28066/2020.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings closed following confirmation of compliance with prior directions.
What the court decided
CON.CASE(C) NO. 997 OF 2021 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 13TH SRAVANA, 1943 CON.CASE(C) NO. 997 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28066/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC:
BINOY T.M AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. MATHAI, RESIDING AT THACHAMPURATH HOUSE, PULICKAMALI P.O., MULAMTHURUTHY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682314 (MECHANIC, KSRTC, CHALAKUDY DEPOT).
BY ADV N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN WPC:
M.T.SUKUMARAN
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (VIGILANCE), KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695023.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BINOY T.M
- respondent
M.T.SUKUMARAN
Coram
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court