Eliyamma v. a.P.Kiran
Case brief
What is this about?
Court heard arguments in a contempt case where the petitioner claimed compliance with the direction in W.P.(C) No. 26280 of 2020 and closed the matter.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 12TH SRAVANA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 803 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 26280/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER:
ELIYAMMA, AGED 58 YEARS W/O.MATHAI, ERUMBADATHIL HOUSE, KOOTHATTUKULAM P.O., KOOTHATTUKULAM - 686 662.
BY ADV N.KRISHNA RAJA MAULI
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:
A.P.KIRAN (AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RDO OFFICE, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM - 686 661.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ELIYAMMA
- respondent
A.P. KIRAN
Coram
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court