Muhamed Ameer P.P. v. K.Manohar
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a contempt of court case where the petitioner/contemnor alleged compliance with the previous High Court judgment, having received a building permit, and seeking closure of the contempt proceedings.
What did the court decide?
The contempt of court case is closed upon satisfaction of compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021/20TH ASWINA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO.476 OF 2021 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.6.2019 IN W.A.NO.1161/2019 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/R1/PETITIONER:
MUHAMED AMEER P.P. AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.IBRAHIM, PARAMBATH PUTHIYAPURAYIL, MANJAKKAL P.O., MAHE, PUDUCHERRY, PIN-670 310, REPRESENTED BY POA HOLDER THALISH AHAMED, S/O.C.K.KUNHAHAMED, AGED 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT AYSHAS, BOULWARD ROAD, MANJAKKAL P.O., MAHE, PUDUCHERRY-670 310
BY ADVS.R.SURENDRAN KUM.S.MAYUKHA
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT NO.1/R1:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Muhammed Ameer P. P.
- respondent
K. Manohar
Coram
A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court