P.Valsala Amma @ Valsala, v. Haridas
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed this contempt petition alleging non-compliance with directions to upload a possession certificate. The court recorded that the respondent had sent the certificate via post, which the petitioner claimed was returned. After examining submissions that the petitioner had already complied with the requirement, the court closed the case without further order.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed based on the submission that the respondent had complied with the directions.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 450 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 8345/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
P.VALSALA AMMA @ VALSALA, AGED 69 YEARS D/O T.K. MADAVAN NAIR, THEKKE PODIYATH HOUSE, NOCHAD.P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673614. BY ADVS. U.P.BALAKRISHNAN SRI.K.R.AVINASH (KUNNATH)
RESPONDENT:
HARIDAS,
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, VILLAGE OFFICER, NOCHAD VILLAGE, NOCHAD P.O., KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673614.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent has complied with the directions issued in the earlier judgment of this court regarding the upload of a possession certificate.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Valsala Amma @ Valsala
- respondent
Haridas
Coram
Anil K. Narendran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court