T.S.Saludeen v. Anupama
Case brief
What is this about?
Court closed this Contempt of Court case after counsel for petitioners stated that the directions in W.P.(C) No.35444/2016 were substantially complied with by the respondent.
What did the court decide?
Contempt of Court case closed without further orders.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 28TH MAGHA,1942 Con.Case(C).No.2306 OF 2019 IN WP(C)No.35444/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) No.35444/2016(E) DATED 18.03.2019 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN THE W.P(C):
1 T.S.SALUDEEN, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.SANTHU, MUHAMMED RAWTHER, MINZIA MANZIL, KOZHIKKADA, THATHAMANGALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT
2 K.NILAVARNEESA, AGED 53 YEARS, W/O.SALUDEEN, MINZIA MANZIL, KOZHIKKADA, THATHAMANGALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT
BY ADVS. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN SRI.K.V.WINSTON SMT.ANU JACOB
RESPONDENT/THIRD RESPONDENT IN THE W.P(C):
ANUPAMA, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE SECRETARY, PUDUNAGARAM GRAMAPANCHAYAT, PALAKKAD DISTICT, PIN-678 503
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.S.Saludeen
- petitioner
K.Nilavarneesa
- respondent
Anupama
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court