A contempt petition arising from a prior civil writ is closed by the court without prejudice to the petitiioner's right to challenge enforcement if so advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 28TH POUSHA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.2081 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 20571/2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 20571/2020(V) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE W.P(C):
VINCENT VARGHESE AGED 50 YEARS S/O.LATE E.M.VARKEY, ILAVUNKAL HOUSE, MANTHONI, POONCHOLA, POTTASSERY P.O., MANNARKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN SRI.K.V.WINSTON
RESPONDENT/FIRST RESPONDENT IN THE W.P(C):
ARJUN PANDYAN I.A.S
AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (RDO), OTTAPALAM, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 101.
BY ADV. SRI.K.J.MANURAJ, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No.2081 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 20571/2020
2
Contempt Case (C) No.2081 of 2020
J U D G M E N T
Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the contempt case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order dated 05.01.2021 passed pursuant to the judgment sought to be enforced, if so advised.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
JUDGE
Mn
Con.Case(C).No.2081 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 20571/2020
3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
| ANNEXURE A1 | A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT WITH LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE ALONG WITH MEMO FILED BY THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN W.P(C) NO.27145/2016 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. |
|---|---|
| ANNEXURE A2 | A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED JUNE 8/2017 IN W.P. (C) NO.27145/2016. |
| ANNEXURE A3 | A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER CLAUSE 6 OF THE KLU ORDER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT ALONG WITH THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD DATED 21/06/2017. |
| ANNEXURE A4 | A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED OCTOBER 1, 2020 IN W.P.(C) NO.20571/2020 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT. |
| ANNEXURE A5 | A TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT ALONG WITH POSTAL RECEIPT. |
| ANNEXURE A6 | A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DELETING THE PROPERTY OF PETITIONER FROM DATA BANK DATED 28/11/2020. |
//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Vincent Varghese
Arjun Pandyan
P.B.Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
