Raji, v. M.H.Hareesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner in a contempt case argued the matter had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the contempt case accordingly.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 5TH ASWINA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1355 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 25625/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER:
RAJI, AGED 45 YEARS W/O. AJAYAN, AMBAZHAKADAN HOUSE, MATTATHUR, THRISSUR-680684.
BY ADV N.KRISHNA RAJA MAULI
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:
M.H.HAREESH,
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RDO OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR – 680003
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAJI
- respondent
M.H.HAREESH
Coram
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court