Sudhir Antony Joseph v. Anil Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Disposal of a contempt case against the petitioner after recording an undertaking to pay a remaining debt in installments. The court closed the contempt proceedings with the right to revive the case on default.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed upon undertaking to pay remaining balance in installments; petitioner reserved right to revive on default.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.O(C).1134/2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 16TH BHADRA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1134 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 40772/2017 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SUDHIR ANTONY JOSEPH, AGED 62 YEARS S/O IVAN JOSEPH,RESIDING AT 9/326(3),"VARAMBASSERIL PEACE LODGE",CRA-913-C,PLAVILA,PVT
ROAD,CHENTHI,MEDICAL COLLEGE.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695011,(RETIRED AS SENIOR MANAGER FROM AUTOKAST LTD).
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUDHIR ANTONY JOSEPH
- respondent
ANIL KUMAR
Coram
SUNIL THOMAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court