Suhail S. v. Samson
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt case, the petitioner submitted that the directions in a prior judgment had been complied with, and the court accepted the submission, recording it and closing the contempt proceedings without issuing further relief.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1089 OF 2021 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1089 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 7052/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC:
SUHAIL S. AGED 31 YEARS S/O. SHAHUL HAMEED, RESIDING AT 449, NOORA MANZIL, PANAYAM, PERINADU P.O., PANAYAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM-691 601
BY ADV S.SREEKUMAR (KOLLAM)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUHAIL S.
- respondent
SAMSON
Coram
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court