Dismissed
Vidya v. Hari
Kerala HCCO/32/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This matrimonial appeal and cross objection were dismissed as not pressed by the counsel on the day of admission.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
¶4
&
¶5
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
¶6
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 12TH BHADRA, 1943
¶7
MAT.APPEAL NO. 873 OF 2020
¶8
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP(RM) 4/2018 OF FAMILY COURT, THODUPUZHA APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS:
¶9
- 1 HARI, AGED 32 YEARS S/O.RAMANAN, KARUKAPPILLIL HOUSE, MUNDANMUDI P.O., BLATHIKAVALA BHAGAM, VANNAPURAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 582.
¶10
- 2 RAMANAN, AGED 67 YEARS S/O.DAMODAR, KARUKAPPILLIL HOUSE, MUNDANMUDI P.O., BLATHIKAVALA BHAGAM, VANNAPURAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 582.
¶11
3 VALSA, AGED 62 YEARS W/O.RAMANAN, KARUKAPPILLIL HOUSE, MUNDANMUDI P.O., BLATHIKAVALA BHAGAM, VANNAPURAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 582.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Hari Ramanayil
- appellant
Valsa Pavattuthil
- petitioner
Vidya
- respondent
Ramanan
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court