Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Muhammed Fisal Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2021)

Home
Kerala HC
2021
Muhammed Fisal Vs State of KeralaMuhammed Fisal v. State of Kerala

Disposed

Muhammed Fisal v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC13 Dec 2021Bail Appl./8698/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The bail application was closed as infructuous on the same day it was admitted.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR

MONDAY, THE 13^TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021/ 22ND AGRAHAYANA, 1943

BAIL APPL. NO. 8698 OF 2021

CRIME NO.311 OF 2020 OF KOLATHUR POLICE STATION,

MALAPPURAM

PETITIONER:

MUHAMMED FISAL,

AGED 28 YEARS, SON OF MOIDEENKUTTY, KALAKAPARA HOUSE, KOLATHUR P.O., MOORKANDA, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM - 679 338.

BY ADV P.C.ANIL KUMAR

RESPONDENT:

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
MUHAMMED FISAL
respondent
STATE OF KERALA

Coram

AI extract

P.G. AJITHKUMAR

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 13 Dec 2021 · December
Registered: 9 Nov 2021
Case no.: Bail Appl./8698/2021

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from P.g. Ajithkumar

Rohith John Vs State of Kerala
10 Dec 2021
Mujeeb Puthenparambil, Vs State of Kerala
10 Dec 2021
Jaffer Vs the State of Kerala
10 Dec 2021
Kabeer P.V. Vs State of Kerala
13 Dec 2021

Cite this judgement

Muhammed Fisal v. State of Kerala, Bail Appl./8698/2021 (KL), decided on 13 December 2021.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

P.G. AJITHKUMAR

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Disposed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail application closed without substantive discussion as infructuous. No precedent applied or reasoned.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

STATE OF KERALA

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

BY SMT.SEENA C., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

ON 13.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE

FOLLOWING:

2

B.A.No.8698 of 2021

P.G. AJITHKUMAR, J.

-----------------------------------------------------------

B.A.No. 8698 of 2021

----------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 10^th day of December, 2021

O R D E R

At the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner,

the Bail Application is closed as infructuous.

Sd/-

P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE

dkr

CNR

KLHC010625242021

Topic

Bail and Remand

Bench

P.g. Ajithkumar

Disposal

CLOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Shamseer.P., Vs the State of Kerala

13 Dec 2021

Philomina Vs the State of Kerala

13 Dec 2021