Basheer v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner requested non-hearing. Court noted writ petition was not pressed and dismissed it noting no substantive matter to adjudicate.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 15TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.810 OF 2020(A)
PETITIONER:
BASHEER
AGED 51 YEARS S/O SIDDIQUE, RESIDING AT KARUKUNNATHU HOUSE, PERINGALA P.O.PALLIKKARA, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.RAJIV NAMBISAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO FINANCE.
2 THE FEDERAL BANK LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, REGISTERED OFFICE AT FEDERAL TOWERS, P.O.BOX NO 103, ALUVA, KERALA, PIN-683 101.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BASHEER
- respondent
UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO FINANCE
- respondent
THE FEDERAL BANK LTD
- respondent
BRANCH MANAGER, FEDERAL BANK LTD
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court