K.a.Johnson, v. the Divisional Railway Manager(Works)
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court treated the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner submitted that the amounts in dispute had been paid by the Railways.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 7TH MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.483 OF 2020(I)
PETITIONER:
K.A.JOHNSON, AGED 55 YEARS
S/O.KUNJAVARA, KOLENCHERRY HOUSE, KOTTAMOM,
NEELESWARAM P.O., KALADY (VIA), ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683 574.
BY ADVS. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN SMT.S.INDU
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER(WORKS), SOUTHERN RAILWAY, PALAKKAD-2.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.A.JOHNSON
- respondent
THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER(WORKS), SOUTHERN RAILWAY, PALAKKAD-2
- respondent
THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL ENGINEER(CO-ORDINATION), SOUTHERN RAILWAY, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PALAKKAD-2
- respondent
THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY HEAD QUARTERS OFFICE, PARK TOWN, CHENNAI-600 003
- respondent
THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, KANNUR-1
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court