This petition sought transfer of registry. The High Court of Kerala directed the 4th respondent to implement an existing order of the Sub Collector, Fort Kochi, directing transfer within one month, and disposed of the writ.
Directed respondents to implement order directing transfer of registry within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 20TH PHALGUNA, 1941
WP(C).No.3834 OF 2020(D)
PETITIONERS:
S/O. RAMANAN, POOTHAM VEETTIL, MUNAMBAM MURI, KUZHUPPILLY VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK.
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.NARAYANAN (PARUR) SMT.LISHA K.R.
RESPONDENTS:
ADV. SRI.DHANIL M R GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.3834 OF 2020(D)
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 10th day of March 2020
The petitioners seek transfer of registry. The Sub Collector, Fort
Kochi already passed Ext.P5 order directing to effect transfer of registry.
In the light of above, if the order has not been varied or interfered, it shall be implemented by the 4th respondent within a period of one month.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
SAS/10/03/2020
WP(C).No.3834 OF 2020(D)
3
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED 2724/2007 DATED 27/09/2007 OF THE KUZHUPPILLY SRO. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED 3167/2007 DATED 12/11/2007 OF THE KUZHUPPILLY SRO. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED NIL. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED NIL. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI, DATED 13/09/2013. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners' request for transfer of registry should be allowed given an existing order.
MANEESH
GEETHA
STATE OF KERALA
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKKANAD
THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KUZHUPPILLY
THE TAHSILDAR, KOCHI
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
