A.B.Valsan v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed W.P.(C).No.38182 of 2017 as infructuous due to the lapse of time, granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the court if so advised.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to petitioners to take up the issue again if so advised.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY,THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2020/1ST POUSHA, 1942
WP(C).No.38182 OF 2017(W)
PETITIONERS:
- 1 A.B.VALSAN, ALUNKAL PARAMBIL, PACHALAM P.O., COCHIN-12.
- 2 T.R.RAJU,CHEMADITHUNDIL, KANYAMPUZHA ROAD, EROOR P.O., THRIPUNITHARA, ERNAKULAM.
- 3 JOHNSON K.V.,KALLOOR HOUSE, VADUTHALA P.O., COCHIN-23.
- 4 SYAMLAL K.A.,KUTTATTUSSERY, PACHALAM P.O., COCHIN-12.
- 5 PREM KUMAR B.,PUTHENKANDATHIL HOUSE, KANDALLOOR NORTH, PATTOLI MARKET P.O., ALAPPUZHA.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.B. Valsan and Others
- respondent
Union of India Represented By Secretary To Ministry Of Railways
- respondent
Senior Divisional Commercial Manager
- respondent
Uber Represented By Nithin Nair
- respondent
Transport Commissioner
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court