Rohini v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed as mediation resulted in settlement regarding family pension dispute between petitioner and fourth respondent.
What did the court decide?
Memo agreement dated 4.12.2020 recorded as part of judgment and attached against fourth respondent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
MONDAY,THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2020/30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942
WP(C).No.26685 OF 2016(I)
PETITIONER:
ROHINI, D/O. LATE BALANARAYANA MENON, KENTHODE VEEDU, KATTUKULAM SOUTH P.O., THIRUVAZHIYODE, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.JAYARAM
RESPONDENTS:
- 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD-678 001.
- 2 THE TAHSILDAR, OTTAPALAM-679 101.
- 3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, SREEKRISHNAPURAM-II VILLAGE, SREEKRISHNAPURAM P.O., PIN-679 513.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rohini
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
The District Collector, Palakkad
- respondent
Narayani Kutty
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court