The petitioner filed a writ petition but submitted that the matter has become infructuous. The Court accepted the submission and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942
WP(C).No.26614 OF 2020(B)
PETITIONER:
SREERAM HOLLOW BRICKS SOUTH PANAMANNA, OTTAPALAM DESOM, OTTAPALAM-I VILLAGE, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, BALAN K., S/O.KRISHNAN, AGED 59 YEARS.
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ
RESPONDENTS:
1 OTTAPALAM MUNICIPALITY OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-679101, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
3 KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-678001, REPRESENTED BY ITS ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER.
BY ADVS. R1-2 BY SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC SRI.PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.26614 OF 2020(B)
2
W.P.(C) No.26614 of 2020
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
JUDGE
Mn
WP(C).No.26614 OF 2020(B)
3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
| EXHIBIT P1 | TRUE COPY OF THE D & O LICENCE ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT TO THE BUSINESS CONCERN PETITIONER DATED 27.11.2019. |
|---|---|
| EXHIBIT P2 | TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 19.3.2020 REGARDING LICENCE FEE FROM THE PETITIONER BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT. |
| EXHIBIT P3 | TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT TO OPERATE ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 21.5.2018. |
| EXHIBIT P4 | TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 27.9.2018 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT DISTRICT INDUSTRIES OFFICER, OTTAPALAM TO THE PETITIONER TOWARDS REGISTRATION OF THE INDUSTRIAL UNIT UNDER KERALA MICRO SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISES FACILITATION ACT. |
| EXHIBIT P5 | TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 9.12.2019 IN WPC NO.30462/2019. |
| EXHIBIT P6 | TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE NO.15 DECISION OF THE COUNCIL OF FIRST RESPONDENT IN THE COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON 14.5.2020. |
| EXHIBIT P7 | TRUE COPY OF THE STOP MEMO DATED 3.6.2020 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. |
| EXHIBIT P8 | TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION DATED 9.6.2020 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER REGARDING STOPPING OF UNIT BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT. |
| EXHIBIT P9 | TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 9.6.2020 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TOWARDS THE RECEIPT OF INTIMATION. |
| EXHIBIT P10 | TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 22.6.2020 REGARDING REDUCTION OF POLLUTION. |
| EXHIBIT P11 | TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 27.7.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT. |
WP(C).No.26614 OF 2020(B)
4
EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 27.7.2020 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P13 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE DATED 6.10.2020 IN WPC NO.20771/2020. EXHIBIT P14 TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION DATED 4.11.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P15 TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT ON BEHALF OF FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 11.11.2020. EXHIBIT P16 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DATED 8.10.2020 OF PETITIONER BEFORE THE MINISTRY OF MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES.
//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
SREERAM HOLLOW BRICKS SOUTH PANAMANNA
OTTAPALAM MUNICIPALITY
KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
