Shreeja S.Nair @ Haleena Nasar v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on admission in a civil writ petition involving State Bank of India respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 22ND MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.2635 OF 2020(D)
PETITIONER:
SHREEJA S.NAIR @ HALEENA NASAR AGED 40 YEARS W/O. AHAMMED NASAR, KAIPPALLIL HOUSE, PUNNAKADU P. O., KOZHENCHERRY, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.ANOOP (MULAVANA)
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE BANK OF INDIA PALLIPURAM BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695316, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
2 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER STATE BANK OF INDIA, SARB, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
ADV.R.S.KALKURA, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.2635 OF 2020(D) 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 11th day of February 2020
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty
to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly the writ
petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/-
AMIT RAWAL JUDGE
ACM/11.2.2020
WP(C).No.2635 OF 2020(D) 3
Shreeja S.Nair @ Haleena Nasar
State Bank of India Pallipuram Branch
The Authorised Officer State Bank of India SARB
Amit Rawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court