Rejimon P.K., v. the Kerala State Financial Enterprises Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of a writ petition seeking a stay on salary recovery from a surety. The court directed recovery to be pursued against the primary defaulting respondent and kept the surety's right to reimbursement open.
What did the court decide?
Respondents directed to take steps for recovery against the fourth respondent; petitioner's rights to claim reimbursement kept open.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 22ND MAGHA, 1941
WP(C).No.1984 OF 2020(W)
PETITIONER:
REJIMON P.K., AGED 49 YEARS S/O. KUNJUKUNJU, PADAPPACKAL HOSUE, THEKKEPURAM, RANNI P.O., DISTRICT-689 672.
BY ADVS. SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE SRI.P.A.REJIMON SRI.BIJO THOMAS GEORGE SMT.NICEY A. MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, REGD. OFFICE, BHADRATHA, MUSEUM ROAD, THRISSUR-680 020 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2 THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED RANNI-PERUNAD BRANCH, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 711 REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court should direct respondents to refrain from recovering salary from the petitioner who was only a surety for a defaulted chitty transaction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rejimion P.K.
- respondent
The Kerala State Financial Enterprises Limited
- respondent
Safia Beevi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court