Disposed

Sunil C.K. v. the Regional Transport Authority

Kerala HC12 Nov 2020WP(C)/14887/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition by a stage carriage operator in Kerala directing the Respondents to expeditiously consider a modified application for a regular permit on an intradistrict route and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Respondents to consider the modified application (Exhibit-P3) and pass appropriate orders expeditiously, within eight weeks.

Sunil C.K. Vs the Regional Transport Authority — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1942

¶5

WP(C).No.14887 OF 2020(I)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

SUNIL C.K. S/O.MALATHI, KRISHNANA DAMODARAM, P.O.CHELERI, KANNADIPARAMBA, KANNUR.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-670002.

¶11

2 THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CIVIL STATION, KANNUR, PIN-670002.

¶12

SRI KP HARISH SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶13

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

WP(C).No.14887 OF 2020

¶15

¶16

JUDGMENT

¶17

The petitioner is a stage carriage operator. He has filed an application seeking issuance of a modified regular permit on an intradistrict route. His prayer in this petition is to consider Ext.P3 modified application for regular permit and take a decision in an expeditious manner.

¶18

I have heard Sri. O.D.Sivadas, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.K.P.Harish, the learned senior Government Pleader.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the submissions made across the Bar, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to take up Exhibit-P3 and pass appropriate orders, in consonance with law and procedure. Orders shall be passed expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

¶20

The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with the judgment before the respondents to ensure compliance.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

¶23

JUDGE

¶24

DSV

¶25

WP(C).No.14887 OF 2020

¶26

¶27

APPENDIX

¶28

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶29

EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 15.7.2019 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTOR, THALIPARAMBA.

¶30

EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE PROCEEDING DATED 19.8.2019 OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR.

¶31

EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE MODIFIED APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH THE PROPOSED SET OF TIMING DATED 25.5.2020.

¶32

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

¶33

NIL

Sunil C.K. v. the Regional Transport Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil C.K. v. the Regional Transport Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayaprasad Pillai Vs the District Collector

P.Rajan Vs the State of Kerala

Annamma Joseph Vs the District Superintendent of Police

Santhakumari.B Vs State of Kerala

Palliveettil Abdu Rahiman Vs District Collector

Abdul Nazar Vs District Collelctor