Nimitha v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without substantive reasons.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF JULY 2020 / 11TH ASHADHA, 1942
WP(C).No.13477 OF 2019(H)
PETITIONER/S:
NIMITHA, AGED 39 YEARS W/O. PRAGEETH, PROPRIETOR, P.K. OIL MILLS, 33/484OE, TP ARCADE, KANNANKUZHI NILAM, CHEVARAMBALAM P.O., CALICUT RESIDING AT PUTHIYEDATHUTHAZHAM HOUSE, CHEVARAMBALAM P.O., CHEVAYOOR VILLAGE, KOZHIKKODE TALUK, KOZHIKKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ
RESPONDENT/S:
1 CANARA BANK CHALAPPURAM BRANCH, CALICUT, 673 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.
2 THE BRANCH MANAGER CANARA BANK, CHALAPPURAM BRANCH, CALICUT, 673 002.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nimitha
- respondent
Canara Bank Chalappuram Branch
- respondent
The Branch Manager Canara Bank, Chalappuram Branch
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court