Shybi v.S., v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner, an UPSA, challenged a non-appointment order via a writ petition. The court disposed of the petition after noting that the respondent 5 had filed a review application against the appointment order and directed a balance of opportunity hearing before deciding the review petition.
What did the court decide?
Directed the 2nd respondent to consider the review petition filed by the 5th respondent with an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within three months.