This writ appeal challenged directions issued to the Tahsildar to effectuate property mutation after notice to parties. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding the original writ petition judgment correct as the appellant was provided sufficient opportunity to place materials.
Writ appeal WB.No. 2144 of 2019 is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 24TH POUSHA, 1941
WA.No.2144 OF 2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 16524/2019(M) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANT/4th RESPONDENT:
ABDUL SAMAD, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, S/O. MOHAMMED KUNJU, V.H. BUILDINGS, KARTHIKAPALLY TALUK, KEERIKKAD VILLAGE, KAYAMKULAM, REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE AND NEXT FRIEND SHYLA, AGED 40 YEARS AND RESIDING IN THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
BY ADVS. SRI.R.MANOJ SMT.P.SHEENA RAJAN SMT.P.M.SHAHIDA
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER AND RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3:
1 NAHA KHAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. YOUSUF KUNJU, PADINJARE MANGALATHU HOUSE, THEKKUMMURI, KEERIKKADU VILLAGE, KAYAMKULAM P.O., PIN-690502, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KEERIKADU VILLAGE, KAYAMKULAM P.O., PIN-690502.
R1 BY ADVS. DR.V.N.SANKARJEE SRI.V.N.MADHUSUDANAN SMT.R.UDAYA JYOTHI SRI.M.M.VINOD SMT.M.SUSEELA SRI.SUDHAKARAN V. R2-R4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER ARAVIND KUMAR BABU
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WA.No.2144 OF 2019
2
JUDGMENT
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ
Challenging the directions issued to the Tahsildar, Karthikapally, respondent No.3 in this writ appeal, to take appropriate decision, after giving notice to both the appellant/respondent No.4 in the writ petition and writ petitioner/1st respondent in the writ appeal, this appeal is filed.
WA.No.2144 OF 2019
3
No.4 in the writ petition, is provided with sufficient opportunity, to place all
the materials before the Tahsildar, Karthikapally, respondent No.3 in this
appeal, for appropriate decision on merits.
In the light of the above, instant writ appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
S.MANIKUMAR
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
SHAJI P.CHALY
JUDGE
smv
Abdul Samad
Naha Khan
The District Collector, Alappuzha District
The Tahsildar, Karthikapally
The Village Officer, Keerikadu Village
SMANIKUMAR
SHAJIPC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
