P25 election notice that 186 booths have been constituted by the Chief Returning Officer obviously, in accordance with the conditions issued in Exhibit-P24 order by the State Government. It is also evident from Exhibit-P25 that the election is conducted at 3 centres at Kollam i.e., S.N.Trust, Central School, Kollam, S.N.Women's College, Kollam and S.N.College, Kollam, at Booth Nos.1 to 60, 61 to 105 and 106 to 186 respectively. Even though various contentions are raised by learned Senior Counsel for appellant, that there is likelihood of violation of the guidelines and Exhibit-P24 order requires to be set aside, we are of the opinion that, the authorities are duty bound to take appropriate action for smooth conduct of the elections. Moreover, it is settled legal position that once an election is notified and if any person is aggrieved, he can only challenge the same after the elections are over. In fact, the learned Single Judge, while declining the interim relief, has borne in mind all these aspects. The realm of interference in an appeal filed under Section 5 of the High Court Act, 1971 is very limited, as to whether there is any legal infirmity justifying interference in the interim order. We are of the considered opinion that the entire aspects have been taken into account, bearing in mind the guidelines issued by the Central and State Governments, and the peremptory requirements contained under Exhibit-P24 order passed by the State Government.