P.J.Francis v. Varkey @ Kunju
Case brief
What is this about?
The Regular Second Appeal was heard and dismissed as withdrawn upon the submission by the appellant's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Regular Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020 / 26TH BHADRA, 1942
RSA.No.474 OF 2008
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN AS 249/2001 DATED 12-01-2007 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT (ADHOC-1), KOTTAYAM
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 92/1999 DATED 19-02-2001 OF MUNSIFF COURT, ETTUMANOOR
APPELLANT:
P.J.FRANCIS, S/O.OUSEPH,
PLATHOTTATHIL, CHERUVANDOOR BHAGOM,KIZHAKKUM BHAGOM KARA, PEROOR VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TLUK.
BY ADV. SRI.A.K.HARIDAS
RESPONDENTS:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.J.FRANCIS
- respondent
1 VARKEY @ KUNJU
- respondent
REJI GEORGE
- respondent
JIJO GEORGE
- respondent
MOLLAMMA GEORGE
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court