Review petition in a writ petition filed before the High Court of Kerala was dismissed as it was withdrawn by the counsel on behalf of the petitioner while reserving the right to exhaust remedies.
Review petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1942
RP.No.749 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 14814/2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 14814/2020(B) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION:
K.M.VARGHESE, AGED 69 YEARS, S/O MATHEW, KOTHAVELIL VEEDU, MANNAR P.O. NIRANAM VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT
BY ADV. SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WRIT PETITION:
SRI KP HARISH, SR GP
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.10.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RP.No.749 OF 2020
IN WP(C). 14814/2020 2
ORDER
After arguing for some time, Sri.K.V.Anil Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw this petition seeking to review the judgment however after reserving his right to exhaust his remedies in accordance with law.
Reserving such rights, this review petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
JUDGE
DSV
K.M.Varghese
The Excise Commissioner
Deputy Excise Commissioner
Station House Officer
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
