Chairman v. Shahul Hameed
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala allowed a Review Petition filed to modify directions in a previous writ judgment. The court ordered that the directions issued in the impugned order must now be construed as addressed to the 3rd respondent instead of the 2nd respondent, with a specific rider on timing.
What did the court decide?
Directions in the previous judgment are to be seen as issued to the 3rd respondent in lieu of the 2nd respondent. The 3rd respondent must place the matter for consideration before the appropriate auth