The High Court of Kerala disposed of a review petition filed against an order in a writ petition concerning property status. The court held the petition was not maintainable due to no apparent error on the face of the record.
The Review Petition stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
FRIDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 18TH MAGHA, 1941
RP.NO.148 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 35981/2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35981/2019(W) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
IBRAHIM, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.KOYAN, MOOLETHODIYIL HOUSE, 200 ACRE KARA, MANNAMKANDAM VILLAGE, ADIMALY, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENTS :
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695001.
SRI RON BASTIAN GP
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RP.NO.148 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 35981/2019
2
ORDER
This petition is filed seeking review of the judgment in W.P.C. No.35981 of 2019 dated 21.01.2020.
RP.NO.148 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 35981/2019
3
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
JUDGE
NS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition is maintainable in the absence of error apparent on the face of the record.
Ibrahim
State of Kerala
District Collector
Revenue Divisional Officer
Tahsildar
Village Officer
Raja Vijayaraghavan V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
