V.Anilkumar v. D.Sreenivasan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a review petition challenging an earlier order allowing a C.M.C.P., the court allowed the petition due to the respondent's counsel's lack of notice, recalling the prior order to allow the C.M.C.P. to proceed.
What did the court decide?
Review petition allowed; order dated 15.07.2019 in C.M.C.P. No.17 of 2019 recalled; C.M.C.P. to be posted on 07.02.2020.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 16TH MAGHA, 1941
RP.No.1225 OF 2019 IN CMCP. 17/2019 IN R.F.A. No.100 of 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15-07-2019 IN CMCP 17/2019 IN R.F.A. NO.100 OF 2019 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
V.ANILKUMAR AGED 46 YEARS VELLANAMKANDATH VEETTIL PADMAVATHY AMMA, ENKKEKAD VILLAGE AND DESOM, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR680 589.
BY ADV. SRI.DILIP J. AKKARA
RESPONDENT/APPLICANT/APPELLANT:
D.SREENIVASAN AGED 77 YEARS S/O. P. DEVARAJA IYYER, NEW AGRAHARAM ROAD, PUNKNNAM DESOM, PUNKUNNAM P.O. THRISSUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR 680 020.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
D.SREENIVASAN
Coram
SATHISH NINAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court