Sageer v. Jubina
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed a review petition filed by Sageer challenging a decree granted to Jubina. The Court held no grounds existed for review as the impugned judgment considered all contentions and there was no apparent error on the record despite the petitioner's non-appearance.
What did the court decide?
Review petition dismissed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 18TH POUSHA, 1941
RP.No.1104 OF 2019 IN Mat.Appeal. 746/2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN Mat.Appeal 746/2013 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DT 31/10/2019
REVIEW PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT:
SAGEER
AGED 39 YEARS S/O. LATE ALIYAR, KALAPPURACKAL HOUSE, MULLUPADI, MUPPATHADAM, ALUVA 683 110.
BY ADV. SRI.T.V.MAMMOOTTY
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether grounds are made out for review of the judgment passed in the main appeal.
Whether there is any error apparent on the face of the record warranting interference.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sageer
- respondent
Jubina
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court