Dismissed
The Federal Bank Ltd. v. Thomas M.Thomas
Kerala HCRFA/411/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020 / 16TH SRAVANA, 1942
RFA.No.411 OF 2009
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 138/2005 DATED 20-12-2008 OF SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
THE FEDERAL BANK LTD. KALLADIKKODE BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER.
BY ADV. SRI.N.P.SAMUEL BY ADV. T.K.CHINNAN, BY ADV. P.M.MOHAMMED ALI BY ADV. B.K.PURUSHOTHAMAN BY ADV. AYPE JOSEPH BY ADV. DILIP J.AKKARA
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 SRI.THOMAS M.THOMAS S/O. MANI THOMAS, MAVELIKUNNEL HOUSE,, PALAKKAYAM POST AND VILLAGE, MANNARKKAD, P.O. PALAKKAYAM, PALAKKAD DIST.
2 SMT. KOCHURANI THOMAS W/O. THOMAS M. THOMAS, MAVELIKUNNEL HOUSE, PALAKKAYAM VILLAGE, MANNARKKAD, P.O. PALAKKAYAM, PALAKKAD, DIST.
R1 – R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN R1 - R2 BY ADV. SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.08.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RFA.No.411 OF 2009 2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that a memo has been filed seeking that this appeal be dismissed as being not pressed, since the disputes between the parties have been settled out of Court.
I, therefore, close this RFA as having been not pressed; with a consequent direction to the Registry to refund the eligible Court Fee to the appellant.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
MC/11.8.2020
THE FEDERAL BANK LTD. KALLADIKKODE BRANCH
SRI. THOMAS M. THOMAS
SMT. KOCHURANI THOMAS
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court