Dismissed

Kalyan Developers v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC17 Jun 2020OT.Rev/104/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision petitioners sought permission to withdraw petitions to approach the Government under the Amnesty Scheme. The court granted permission. Both petitions were dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to proceed under the Scheme.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw petitions granted; petitions dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to rights under the Amnesty Scheme.

Kalyan Developers Vs State of Kerala — Kerala HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

OT.Rev.NoS.103 & 104 OF 2019

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

¶6

¶7

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI

¶8

WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 27TH JYAISHTA, 1942

¶9

OT.Rev.No.103 OF 2019

¶10

AGAINST THE ORDER IN TA(VAT) NO.288/2016 DATED 15-07-2019 OF THE KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM

¶11

REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE:

¶12

M/S.KALYAN DEVELOPERS

¶13

TC 35/1403, SREEKRISHNA BUILDING, WEST PALACE ROAD, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, KARTHIK RAMANI

¶14

BY ADVS. SRI.SANTHOSH P.ABRAHAM SMT.S.K.DEVI

¶15

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE:

¶16

STATE OF KERALA

¶17

REPRESENTED BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001

¶18

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED RAFIQ

¶19

THIS OTHER TAX REVISION (VAT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17.06.2020, ALONG WITH OT.Rev. NO.104/2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶21

PRESENT

¶22

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

¶23

¶24

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI

¶25

WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 27TH JYAISHTA, 1942

¶26

OT.Rev.No.104 OF 2019

¶27

AGAINST THE ORDER IN TA(VAT) NO.623/2017 DATED 15-07-2019 OF THE KERALA VAT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM

¶28

REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE:

¶29

M/S.KALYAN DEVELOPERS

¶30

TC 35/1403, SREEKRISHNA BUILDING, WEST PALACE ROAD, THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, KARTHIK RAMANI

¶31

BY ADVS. SRI.SANTHOSH P.ABRAHAM SMT.S.K.DEVI

¶32

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/REVENUE:

¶33

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS FINANCE SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001

¶34

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED RAFIQ

¶35

THIS OTHER TAX REVISION (VAT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17.06.2020, ALONG WITH OT.Rev. NO.103/2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶36

OT.Rev.NoS.103 & 104 OF 2019

¶37

¶38

O R D E R

¶39

K. Vinod Chandran, J.

¶40

The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner in both the revision petitions seeks permission to withdraw the revision petitions for approaching the Government under the Amnesty Scheme. Permission granted and both revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to proceed under the Amnesty Scheme.

¶41

Sd/-

¶42

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge.

¶43

Sd/-

¶44

T.R. RAVI, Judge.

sp/17/06/2020

//True Copy//

P.A. To Judge

OT.Rev.NoS.103 & 104 OF 2019

¶49

¶50

APPENDIX OF OT.Rev 103/2019

¶51

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶52

ANNEXURE I TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32081696032/2015-16(FROM 01.4.2015 TO 30.09.2015) DATED 30.11.2015 ANNEXURE II TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER KVTA APPEAL NO.488/15 DATED 1.8.2016 ANNEXURE III TRUE COPY OF THE TRIBUNAL ORDER TA (VAT) NOS.288/2016 AND 623/2017 DATED 15.7.2019

¶53

OT.Rev.NoS.103 & 104 OF 2019

¶54

¶55

APPENDIX OF OT.Rev 104/2019

¶56

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶57

ANNEXURE-I TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32081696032/2015-16 DATED 27.6.2016 ANNEXURE-IA TRUE COPY OF THE RECTIFIED ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32081696032/2015-16 DATED 25.8.2016 ANNEXURE-II TRUE COPY OF THE APPELLATE ORDER KVTA APPEAL NO.688/16 DATED 30.6.2017 ANNEXURE-IV TRUE COPY OF THE TRIBUNAL ORDER A (VAT) NOS 288/2016,623/2017 DATED 15.07.2019

Kalyan Developers v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalyan Developers v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunhiraman Jewellery, Vs the State of Kerala

M/S.Kunhiraman Jewellery, Vs the State of Kerala

M/S. Kunhiraman Jewellery Vs the State of Kerala

Commissioner of Customs Vs Konkan Storage Systems

Palattu Raveendran Vs Soopikaveettil Nazarudeen

M/S.Kalyan Developers Vs State of Kerala