Union of India v. R.Lekha
Case brief
What is this about?
This Bench answered applications challenging the rejection of claims for financial upgradation under ACPS and MACPS. The court held that ad hoc service cannot be reckoned for these schemes.
What did the court decide?
The original petition allowing the claim for financial upgradation based on ad hoc service was set aside.
What the court decided
OP(CAT).75/17
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 1ST MAGHA, 1941
OP (CAT).No.75 OF 2017(Z)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA 180/2015 DATED 28-06-2016 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH
PETITIONER/S:
1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, DAIRYING AND FISHERIES, NEW DELHI.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether ad hoc service can be reckoned for the purpose of Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) grants.
Whether ad hoc service can be reckoned for the purpose of Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) benefits.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Union of India represented by the Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture
- respondent
R. Lekha
- respondent
S. Padmakumari
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court