This original petition has been filed challenging an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing R.A.No.54/2018 as per order dated 5.07.2019. In fact, the petitioner had filed a contempt petition as C.P.(C).No.26/2018 which came to be dismissed on 15.11.2018. Alleging that there are errors apparent on the face of record R.A. No.54/2018 was filed. The petitioner challenges both the orders. The contention urged by the petitioner was that by Annexure A8 order dated 11.11.2011, the Tribunal issued a direction to consider all the cases of part time or full time casual labourers in the Sub Division concerned for selection to the post of GDSBPM, Porkulam and it was further pointed out that if the applicant happens to be meritorious out of them, he may be given the appointment as GDSBPM. The aforesaid order was challenged before the High Court and by Annexure A9 order dated 20.3.2012, the said order was stayed. Subsequently, the High Court confirmed the Annexure A8 order. It is seen that after conducting selection, the respondents appointed one Lakshmi M.T to the aforesaid post.
