This was an appeal against an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The matter was disposed of on the same day it was finally heard based on a compromise petition filed by the appellant and fourth respondent.
The appeal is allowed in terms of the compromise filed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
MACA.No.2468 OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
FRIDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 15TH KARTHIKA, 1942
MACA.No.2468 OF 2015(A)
AGAINST THE AWARD IN OPMV 578/2007 DATED 09-07-2014 OF MOTOR
ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, ALAPPUZHA
APPELLANT/S:
P.M.THOMAS
AGED 44 YEARS
S/O. LATE MATHAI, PALLIKKARA HOUSE, VALAMANGALAM
SOUTH P.O., THURAVOOR, CHERTHALA TALUK.
BY ADVS.
SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR
SMT.V.SHYLAJA
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE MANAGER, HONEY WELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION LAB (P)
LITD NO.151/01, DORAISANI PALYA, B.G.ROAD,
BANGALORE-560 076.
2 LALIT SANKRAMNO.45 GF IV CROSS NEAR MAYURA BEKARI, J.P.NAGAR,
2ND PHASE, BANGALORE.- 560 001
3SANKRANI LALIT KUMAR TARAACHAND
S/O TARACHAND SANKRANI, 11/12 VRINDAVAN LAY OUT,
BENNAR GATTA ROAD, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA
STATE.560001
4TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
REPRSENTED BY ITS MANAGER, BRANCH OFFICE, CHICAGO
PLAZA, 2ND FLOOR, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM.-682 013
R1 BY ADV. SRI.MATHEWS K.UTHUPPACHAN
R1 BY ADV. SRI.SHARAN SHAHIER
R1 BY ADV. SRI.TERRY V.JAMES
R4 BY ADV. SRI.P.S.RAMU
THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 06.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
2
MACA.No.2468 OF 2015
C.S.DIAS, J.
======================
MACA No. 2468 of 2015
====================== Dated this the 6th day of November, 2020.
JUDGMENT
The appellant and fourth respondent have filed I.A No.1/2020 – a compromise petition dated 27.10.2020, stating that the subject-matter in dispute between the parties has been settled as per the terms and conditions in the compromise petition.
In the result, this appeal is allowed in terms of the compromise, which shall form part of this judgment.
Sd/-
C.S.DIAS
JUDGE
SKS/6.11.2020
P.M.THOMAS
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
C.S.Dias
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court