The High Court of Kerala dismissed a First Execution Appeal (EFA.No.30 of 2000) for non-prosecution, as the appellants failed to appear or present representations on hearing dates.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 26TH POUSHA, 1941
EFA.No.30 OF 2000
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OS 118/1991 DATED 26-06-2000 OF SUB COURT, PAYYANNUR
APPELLANTS:
1 PEEDIAKKAL MARIYAM @ MARIAKUTTY W/O.CHANDY, AGED 64, VELLADU AMSOM, NADUVIL DESOM, VAYATHUPARAMBU.
2 JOSEPH S/O.CHANDY AGED 44 AGRICULTURIST -DO-
3 THOMAS, S/O.CHANDY, AGED 41, AGRICULTURIST -DO4 MARY, D/O.CHANDY, AGED 40 -DO5 THRESSIAMMA, D/O.CHANDY, AGED 39-DO-
SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 PALLIVADUKKAL ELIAMMA, W/O.AUGUSTY, VELLADU AMSOM, NADUVIL DESOM, TALIPARAMBA. 2 PALLIVADUKKAL VARGHESE, S/O.VARGHESE AGRICULTURIST, -DO-
ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ
THIS EXECUTION FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
EFA.No.30 OF 2000
2
JUDGMENT
No representation for the appellants on 13.01.2020, 14.01.2020 and on today, guiding me to the impression that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal any further.
Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
Stu
PEEDIAKKAL MARIYAM @ MARIAKUTTY
JOSEPH
THOMAS
MARY
THRESSIAMMA
ROSAMMA
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
