This court closed a criminal revision petition filed challenging an order under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, noting that the revision petitioner was no longer alive and the underlying matter had been settled pending proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF MARCH 2020/14TH PHALGUNA, 1941
Crl.Rev.Pet.No.1303 OF 2014
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN Crl.A.210/2012 DATED 08-05-2014 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT - III, MAVELIKARA
AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 53/2011 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE, HARIPAD
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT IN M.C.:
T.K.SANKARA NARAYANAN, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.KESAVA KARANAVAR, GAYATHRIYIL VEETTIL, KAROOR MURI, PURAKKAD VILLAGE, AMBALAPPUZHA,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-688561.
BY ADV.SMT.VILASINI NAYAK RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/APPLICANT IN M.C. & STATE:
1 SUJA,
AGED 52 YEARS, D/O.SUKUMARAN NAIR, PANDAVATHU VEETTIL,
PALLANA MURI, THRIKKUNNAPPUZHA VILLAGE, ALLEPPEY,PRESENTLY RESIDING AT GAYATHRIYIL VEETTIL, KAROOR MURI, PURAKKAD VILLAGE,AMBALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DIST.PIN-688561.
2 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
R1 BY ADV.SRI.M.IBRAHIMKUTTY R1 BY ADV.SRI.T.MADHU R2 PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MS.M.N.MAYA
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.R.P.No.1303 of 2014
..2..
ORDER
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the revision petitioner is no more.
In the result, Crl.R.P. stands closed.
Sd/-
N.ANIL KUMAR, JUDGE
skj
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.K.SANKARA NARAYANAN
SUJA
STATE OF KERALA
N.ANIL KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
