State of Kerala v. Arun Gopan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Petitioner's Criminal Miscelllaneous Case was dismissed as infructuous because the matter had become so. Public Prosecutor relied on the infructuousness.
What did the court decide?
Crl.MC. dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF JULY 2020 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.3984 OF 2016
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMP 1047/2016 DATED 28-05-2016 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT,KOTTAYAM
CRIME NO.339/2016 OF Kuravilangadu Police Station , Kottayam
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT IN CRL.M.P:
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, SESSIONS COURT,REPRESENTING THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KADUTHURUTHY.
BY ADV. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
ARUN GOPAN
- respondent
MOHAMMED ASHRAF ALI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court