Allowed

Ayoob K. v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC25 Feb 2020Crl.MC/231/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous Case involving alleged offences under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 324, 308, 149. The de facto complainants filed affidavits stating the dispute was amicably settled with no grievance. The Court allowed the petition and quashed the entire criminal proceedings in view of settlement.

What did the court decide?

The entire proceedings as against the petitioners in Crime No.217/2019 of Vellamunda Police Station stands quashed.

Ayoob K. Vs State of Kerala — Quashing and FIR | Kerala HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 6TH PHALGUNA, 1941

¶5

Crl.MC.No.231 OF 2020(H)

¶6

CRIME NO.217/2019 OF Vellamunda Police Station , Wayanad

¶7

PETITIONER/S:

¶8

1 AYOOB K. AGED 45 YEARS S/O.IBRAHIM, KUNDILOD VEEDU, THARUVANA.P.O, PEECHAM CODE, WAYAND DISTRICT

¶9

2 IQBALUDHEEN AGED 32 YEARS S/O.ABDULLA, MAKKI VEEDU, KUNDHAMANGALAM.P.O, PEECHAGOD, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.E.A.HARIS

¶11

RESPONDENT/S:

¶12

1 STATE OF KERALA

¶13

REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA-682018

¶14

2 VYSHAK.P AGED 30 YEARS

¶15

S/O.KRISHNADAS, PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, THINDUMMAL AMSOM, MANANDAVADI TALUK, WAYNAD DISTRICT-670645

¶16

3 RAMEES K.P AGED 27 YEARS S/O.ABDULLA.K.P, KUNNOTH HOUSE, KATRIKULAM.P.O, WYNAD DISTRICT-670648

¶17

R2-3 BY ADV. K.S.MOHANDAS

¶18

OTHER PRESENT:

¶19

SRI HRITHWIK C.S (SR - P P

¶20

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

Crl.MC.No.231 OF 2020(H) 2

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

Dated this the 25th day of February 2020

¶24

Petitioners are accused in Crime No.217/2019 of Vellamunda Police Station for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 324 and 308 r/w Section 149 of IPC.

¶25

The de facto complainant and injured are respondents 2 and 3, have appeared through counsel and filed affidavits to the effect that the matter has been amicably settled and that they do not have any grievance against the petitioners. A report to that effect has also been obtained from the investigating officer. The petitioners do not have any criminal antecedents. There is no public interest involved. The injuries are not very serious and life threatening.

¶26

In the result, the Crl.M.C is allowed and the entire proceedings as against the petitioners in Crime No.217/2019 of Vellamunda Police Station stands quashed under section 482

of Cr.P.C.

SD/-

ASHOK MENON

JUDGE

rmm

Crl.MC.No.231 OF 2020(H) 3

¶33

APPENDIX

¶34

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶35

ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.217/2019 OF VELLAMUMDA POLICE STATION ANNEXURE A2 AFFIDAVIT OF THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT/2ND RESPONDENT ANNEXURE A3 AFFIDAVIT OF THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT/3RD RESPONDENT

Ayoob K. v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayoob K. v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lijo Vs State of Kerala

Akhil, Vs State of Kerala

Najeeb Rahman @ Kunippa Vs State of Kerala

Najeeb Vs State of Kerala

Salman Faris Vs the State of Kerala

Manu Vs State of Kerala