Linto V.R v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala quashed the FIR and proceedings under Sections 406, 408, 417, 418 IPC as the matter was settled out of court with a notarized affidavit filed by the complainant.
What did the court decide?
FIR and further proceedings are quashed. Crl.M.C. is allowed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942
Crl.MC.No.2267 OF 2017
CRIME NO.1430/2016 OF KADAVANTHRA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
LINTO V.R AGED 35, S/O.RAPPAI, VELATHIPARAM, PERMBRAKARA, KODAKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR
BY ADVS. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.S.S.ARAVIND
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADAVANTHARA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY P.P. HIGH SCHOOL OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM 682031
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quantum of settlement and submission of affidavit deserves quashing of FIR under Sections 406, 408, 417, 418 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
LINTO V.R
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
MANOJ V JOHN
- respondent
SMT. MOLLY MANOJ
- respondent
MR. MARVELL GREEVAS MANOJ
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court