Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co. (P) Ltd. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant's criminal appeal was dismissed as it was not pressed by counsel on the day of hearing. No substantive reasons were recorded.
Appellant's criminal appeal was dismissed as it was not pressed by counsel on the day of hearing. No substantive reasons were recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 29TH ASWINA, 1942
CRL.A.No.827 OF 2012
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 527/2008 DATED 24-06-2010 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -III, KOZHIKODE
AGAINST THE ORDER IN Crl.L.P. 247/2012 DATED 24-05-2012 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT:
SREE GOKULAM CHIT AND FINANCE CO. (P) LTD.NO.66, ARCOT ROAD, CHENNAI-24, REPRESENTED BY IT'S POWER OF ATTORNEY HARIPRIYA.K.K, ASSISTANT LEGAL OFFICER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, SREE GOKULAM CHIT AND FINANCE CO.(P)LTD., TECHNO TOP BUILDING, VAIKOM MUHAMMAD BASHEER ROAD, CALICUT-1.
BY ADV. SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS/STATE AND ACCUSED:
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2 ABDUL RAFEEQ.O.K. S/o HASSAN, 'DIL', KURUVATTOOR POST, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673 611.
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. E.C. BINEESH R2 BY ADV. SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21.10.2020. THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.A. No.827 of 2012
2
JUDGMENT
Not pressed memo filed by the counsel is recorded.
Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
DMR/-
SREE GOKULAM CHIT AND FINANCE CO. (P) LTD.
STATE OF KERALA
ABDUL RAFEEQ.O.K.
P. SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court