This contempt case against the petitioners for challenging the impugned judgment was closed as the petitioners had accepted the rejection of their request. The court allowed them to file a challenge in accordance with law.
Contempt case closed; petitioners at liberty to challenge the impugned order in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 22ND KARTHIKA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.972 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 24743/2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)NO.24743/2019(P) DATED 17.02.2020
PETITIONER/S:
BY ADV. SRI.PADAYATTEE YELDO
RESPONDENT/S:
BY SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.K.J. MOHAMED ANZAR
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13.11.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
C.O(C).No.972/2020 2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 13th day of November 2020
In the light of the fact that an order has been passed rejecting the petitioners' request, the Contempt Case is closed. The petitioners are at liberty to challenge the said order in accordance with law.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
JUDGE
ln
C.O(C).No.972/2020 3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 24743/19 OF HONBLE HIGH COURT DATED 17.06.2020.
M.SEEVALAMUTHU AND OTHERS
MR.GIGI KUNNAPPILLY AND OTHERS
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
