M.Badusha v. R.Binu
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the court examined allegations that the Sub Inspector of Police failed to comply with a prior judgment regarding the closure of an illegal fish market. Notwithstanding an anomaly regarding the date of reading the judgment in the affidavit, the court noted evidence of compliance and decided to close the proceedings.
What did the court decide?
The contempt proceedings were not proceeded with and the case was closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2020 / 18TH KARTHIKA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.818 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 9621/2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.11.2018 IN WP(C) 9621/2020(C) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/ PETITIONER :
M.BADUSHA, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. LATE MUHAMMAD HANEEFA, T.C. NO. 46/41(1), SAFA MANZIL, OPPOSITE TO CORDOVA HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, NEAR NH BYPASS, AMBALATHARA, POONTHURA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 026.
BY ADV. SHRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM
RESPONDENT :
R.BINU,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the learned Sub Inspector of Police committed contempt of court by allegedly failing to adhere to the judgment dated 30.04.2020.
Whether the averments made by the contemnor in the affidavit amount to falsehood given the digital signing date of the judgment.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
R.Binu
Coram
Bechu Kurian Thomas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court