A contempt case was dropped following the Bank's undertaking to correct errors in communication and judgment regarding the petitioner's account name and dates.
The contempt case was dropped; Bank undertook to correct name and date errors.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2020 / 24TH ASHADHA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.492 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 32831/2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 32831/2019(D) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
V.VIJAYAKUMAR AGED 62 YEARS S/O APPU NAIR,ANUGRAHA,PUTHUPARIYAARAM, PALAKKAD-678731.
BY ADVS. SRI.C.HARIKUMAR SRI.RENJITH RAJAPPAN SMT.NOVA SEN ABRAHAM
RESPONDENT/THIRD RESPONDENT:
PRINCE SURENDRAN (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),MANAGER,ICICI BANK LIMITED,UDAYA TOWERS,NEAR RAPPADI AUDITORIUM,WEST FORT ROAD,PALAKKAD-678001.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA R1 BY ADV. SRI.SURESH SUKUMAR R1 BY ADV. SHRI.CHACKO MATHEWS K.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15.07.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
COC 492/20
-2-
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 15th day of July 2020
Respondent appears. Heard both sides.
the mistake which has crept in the communication mentioning the name of the petitioner as
A.V.Vijayakumar in place of V.Vijayakumar will not stand in the way of the petitioner operating the
account and if at all there is any mistake, it will stand corrected.
date as mentioned in Annexure-A3 which also the
Bank undertakes to correct. More over, there is
already an amount of Rs.4,99,000/- odd in the
account as on 9.3.2020. Amount in the deposit up
to Rs.4,94,330.63 can be withdrawn, and there is absolutely no embargo in the petitioner operating
the account to that extent.
COC 492/20
-3-
The Contempt of Court Case is dropped with the
above observation.
Sd/-
ASHOK MENON
JUDGE
jg
The recital “amount in the deposit up to Rs.4,94,330.63 can be withdrawn” occuring in the paragraph 3 of the judgment dated 15.07.2020 in Contempt Case 492/2020 is substituted and read as “amounts in deposit in excess of Rs.4,94,330.63 can be withdrawn” as per order dated 09.09.2020 in RP 570/2020 in COC 492/2020.
Sd/Deputy Registrar
COC 492/20
-4-
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN W.P(C)NO.32831 OF 2019 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 27.12.2019. ANNEXURE A2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C)NO.32831 OF 2019 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 10.02.2020 ANNEXURE A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE BANK ON 12.02.2020.
V. Vijayakumar
Prince Surendran
ICICI Bank Limited
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
