Contempt of court case closed after respondents submitted that the court direction had been complied with; no further proceeding necessary.
Contempt of court case closed; no further proceeding taken.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
TUESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 14TH ASWINA, 1942 Con.Case(C).No.42 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 31739/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 12-10-2018 IN WP(C) 31739/2016(N) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/10TH PETITIONER:
RAJEEVA LOCHANAN K R AGED 62 YEARS, S.O K.R.RAGHAVAN, VATTATHIL HOUSE, S S ASHRAMAM ROAD, ERNAKULAM NORTH P.O, KOCHI, RETIRED ASSISTANT MANAGER, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES (M & M) CORPORATION LTD, WAREHOUSE, REGIONAL OFFICE, THRIPUNITHURA. EPF A/C. NO. KR/TVM/10416/191, PPO NO.KR/KCH/00093950.
BY ADVS. SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH SRI.T.K.DEVARAJAN SMT.T.N.SREEKALA SRI.FRANKLIN ARACKAL SRI.M.B.SOORI SRI.JAISON JOSEPH(KOOTHATTUKULAM) SRI.PAUL C THOMAS
RESPONDENTS/2ND & 3RD RESPONDENTS
1 SUNIL BARTHWAL
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANOISATION, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN,14,BHIKAJI CAMA PALACE, NEW DELHI-110006
2 SMT.RENU RAMACHANDRAN
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695004
OTHER PRESENT: ADV. NITA. N.S, S.C.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.10.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con. Case (C) No.42/2020
-2-
J U D G M E N T
DATED THIS THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020
Shaffique, J:
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that direction issued by this court had already been complied with. Taking into account of the aforesaid submission, we do not think it necessary to proceed further in this contempt of court case.
Accordingly the contempt of court case is closed.
Sd/-
A.M.SHAFFIQUE
JUDGE
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE
AMG
Con. Case (C) No.42/2020
-3-
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN WPC NO. 31739/2016 DATED 12/10/2018.
ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE CASE STATUS OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN SLP (C) NO.8658-8659/2019 AS DOWNLOADED FROM THE WEBSITE OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT.
RAJEEVA LOCHANAN K R
SUNIL BARTHWAL
SMT.RENU RAMACHANDRAN
A.M.SHAFIQUE
GOPINATH P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
