S.Sreekumar v. Gayathri Devi.S
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of an interim order directing the disbursement of retiral benefits. The High Court closed the petition upon the petitioner's submission that the retiral benefits had already been paid, while preserving liberty for the petitioner to raise grievances regarding the non-payment of benefits related to the fixation of the last pay.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; liberty reserved to raise grievance regarding non-fixation of last pay benefits.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.1431 OF 2020 IN DBP. 31/2020
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.08.2020 IN DBP 31/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/ADDL. 4TH RESPONDENT:
S.SREEKUMAR
AGED 57 YEARS S/O. LATE M.P SIVARAMA PILLAI, RETIRED DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (DIRECTOR, CULTURAL AFFAIRS, TDB) RESIDING AT KOYIPURATH HOUSE, T.P CENTRE, HARIPAD 690 514
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience warrants continuation given the petitioner's reliance on the compliance of retiral benefits.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Sreekumar
- respondent
Gayathri Devi.S
- respondent
B.S Thirumeni
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court