This is a brief contempt of court order where the learned counsel submitted that the direction from the writ petition was complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the contempt case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.1209 OF 2020 IN WP(C).1345/2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.03.2020 IN WP(C)No.1345 of 2020(P) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION:
PRINCY MATHEW, AGED 38 YEARS, W/O. TIJUMON P.K, THARAYIL HOUSE, MYLAPRA TOWN P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA, 689678 (UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, ST. MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL, PATHANAMTHITTA)
BY ADV. SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 4 IN THE WRIT PETITION:
1 A.SHAJAHAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.
2 JEEVAN BABU K, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION (FORMERLY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS), OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001. 3 P.K. HARIDAS, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION) OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION), PATHANAMTHITTA AT THIRUVALLA- 689101. 4 RENUKA BHAI M.S, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PATHANAMTHITTA – 689645.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER - SMT. RASHMI K.M.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.10.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No.1209/2020 IN WP(C).1345/2020
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 27th day of October, 2020
The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the direction contained in the writ petition has
been complied with.
Accordingly, the Contempt of Court case is closed.
Sd/- N. NAGARESH JUDGE
SR
Princy Mathew
Shajahan
N. Nagareth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
