P.M. Aleyamma v. Sarada Muraleedharan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed a contempt of court case. The Government Pleader produced proof of compliance regarding a claim under a prior writ petition, but the Government ultimately rejected the claim. The court clarified that the petitioner could challenge the rejection in a separate writ petition if aggrieved.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed following the submission that the petitioner could approach the Court via a separate writ petition against the Government's rejection of her claim.
What the court decided
Con.Case(C).No.1203 OF 2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.1203 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 7861/2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 7861/2020(G) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
P.M. ALEYAMMA
AGED 55 YEARS
W/O. JOSEPH SEBASTIAN, MAGLAVIL HOUSE, KURISHUMMOOD P.O., VAZHAPPALLY VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 104.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.M. Aleyamma
- respondent
Sarada Muraliedharan
- respondent
Dr. P.K. Jayasree
- respondent
Veena Babu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court