C.K.Jarly v. M.P.Dinesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Order closing a contempt of court case after the court accepted that directions were complied with; case closed without prejudice to party contentions.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed without prejudice to the contentions of the parties.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
MONDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 12TH PHALGUNA, 1941 Con.Case(C).No.104 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 25366/2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 25366/2019(U) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
C.K.JARLY, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.KUNJAPPAN, CHUNDAKKADAN HOUSE, VENGOLA PO, VIA PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH M.P.
RESPONDENT:
M.P.DINESH, (FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023.
T.P.SAJAN,SC
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.K.JARLY
- respondent
M.P.DINESH
Coram
ANU SIVARAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court